Creatives

All creatives
1:12
C Facebook

Long-form Testimonial

Ugc Testimonial 1:12

Ugc Testimonial Status Belonging Calm Learn More Promotion
Iterate Specific changes to test 74.0% confidence

Story is compelling but 72s is too long for the feed. Cut a 30s version leading with the result.

Analyzed 1d ago claude-opus-4-8

Performance

Creative Score
60
ROAS

Video Retention

Hook Rate
25.0%
Hold Rate
30.0%
Watch Score
36.0%

Reach & Distribution

Spend
Reach
94K

Engagement

Save Rate
2.0%

Attention Retention

Where viewers drop off across the play

100% 75% 50% 25% 0% 0:00 0:18 0:36 0:54 1:12 -26% steepest drop -38% -10% -6%
18s 18%lost

Pacing dips after the hook before the value is shown

On screen: Talking head, no on-screen text

43s 12%lost

CTA introduced before desire peaks

On screen: Product close-up with price

Across Recent Posts

Reach and engagement rate by publish date

Reach

4.6K 5K 5.4K 5.9K 6.3K D01 D04 D07 D10 D13 D16

Engagement Rate

4.9% 5.2% 5.5% 5.8% 6.1% D01 D04 D07 D10 D13 D16

AI Verdict

Model read of this creative

Iterate 74.0% confidence

Story is compelling but 72s is too long for the feed. Cut a 30s version leading with the result.

Issue

The payoff is good but it arrives too late - viewers drop before the reveal.

Fix. Move the product reveal into the first second.

Hook analysis Moderate
"I did not expect this to actually work."

Pattern-interrupt visual plus a first-person line earns the next 3 seconds of attention.

Cut recommendations
  • Cut the slow intro
  • Front-load the single clearest benefit
Next test

Front-loading the reveal is the highest-leverage single change to test next.

Analyzed 1d ago claude-opus-4-8

A/B Test

Testimonial vs Question

Variable: Hook tactic
+16.7% lift on Save rate

The winning variant opened with a face and a first-person line; the runner-up led with the product. Audience attention in the first second was the deciding factor.

Related Creatives

Same channel, ranked by creative score