Creatives

All creatives
0:24
B Paid

Before / After Split Screen

Before After Pattern Interrupt 0:24

Before After Pattern Interrupt Social Proof Fomo Playful Shop Now Education
Hold Maintain spend, monitor 74.0% confidence

The split-screen reveal carries it. Watch for fatigue - frequency is climbing on retargeting.

Analyzed 1d ago claude-opus-4-8

Performance

Creative Score
76
ROAS
3.10x

Video Retention

Hook Rate
29.0%
Hold Rate
41.0%
Watch Score
47.0%

Reach & Distribution

Spend
$7,200
Reach
154K

Engagement

Save Rate
3.0%

Attention Retention

Where viewers drop off across the play

100% 75% 50% 25% 0% 0:00 0:06 0:12 0:18 0:24 -26% steepest drop -27% -13% -8%
6s 18%lost

Pacing dips after the hook before the value is shown

On screen: Talking head, no on-screen text

14s 12%lost

CTA introduced before desire peaks

On screen: Product close-up with price

AI Verdict

Model read of this creative

Hold 74.0% confidence

The split-screen reveal carries it. Watch for fatigue - frequency is climbing on retargeting.

What is working
  • Mid-funnel conversion is steady with warm audiences
  • Format communicates the value prop clearly without sound
Issue

Hook rate sits just under the account median - the first frame is slow.

Fix. Open on the strongest visual moment and add an on-screen hook line in the first 0.5s.

Hook analysis Moderate
"I did not expect this to actually work."

Pattern-interrupt visual plus a first-person line earns the next 3 seconds of attention.

Cut recommendations
  • Trim the 2-3s of setup before the payoff
Next test

Tightening the open should lift hook rate without hurting hold.

Analyzed 1d ago claude-opus-4-8

A/B Test

Pattern Interrupt vs Unboxing

Variable: Hook tactic
+34.8% lift on ROAS

The winning variant opened with a face and a first-person line; the runner-up led with the product. Audience attention in the first second was the deciding factor.

Related Creatives

Same channel, ranked by creative score